Because the soldiers sent to Boston to support the Townshend Act of 1767 were poorly paid, some of them tried to find part-time work, a practice that didn’t sit well with many Bostonians. So it wasn’t unusual for fights to break out between soldiers and groups of colonists.
Boston Massacretext Context And Subtextmac's History Textbook
Boston Massacre, (March 5, 1770), skirmish between British troops and a crowd in Boston, Massachusetts. Widely publicized, it contributed to the unpopularity of the British regime in much of colonial North America in the years before the American Revolution. The New York Times and its Uyghur “activist” - World Socialist Web Site www. Wsws.org / en/ articles/2019/05/09/ uygh-m09.html 9 May 2019 - The New York Times has furnished a case study of the way in which it functions as the conduit for the utterly hypocritical “human rights” campaigns fashioned by the CIA and the State Department to prosecute the predatory interests of US.
On the night of March 5, a small mob of lowlifes began throwing rocks and snowballs at a British sentry outside the customs house.
Boston Massacretext Context And Subtextmac's History 3rd Edition
Another 20 British soldiers appeared with fixed bayonets, the crowd grew to as many as 300 boys and men, and after about 30 minutes of being taunted and pelted with rocks and sticks, one of the soldiers opened fire. A few minutes later, 11 members of the mob were dead or wounded.
At a subsequent trial, the soldiers were ably defended by a Boston lawyer named John Adams, and all but two were acquitted. The two soldiers found guilty were branded on the hand and then let go. But the radicals among the colonists milked the incident for all it was worth.
A highly exaggerated engraving of the “massacre” was made by a silversmith named Paul Revere, and copies of it circulated all over the colonies.
Boston Massacretext Context And Subtextmac's History Pdf
Ironically, on the day of the incident, the Townshend Acts were repealed by Parliament — except for the tax on tea.